Search results

-1, I see no way this concept benefits either of the regiments and moreso just feel it steps on the toes of each other. If you wanna do 501st things go on 501st, if you wanna do IC things go on IC. No need to complicate it further than this really imo

Talks with individuals have been had, and there are a few reasons why ISF do not get granted many things as of recent. Passive RP or things to do around the ship when there are no ISF Coordinators online do seem scarce yes. However, if you have any suggestions for what ISF could do during these...

I see your point of not being allowed to build AT-ATs from a logic standpoint, plus having it dropped in for them beforehand does look much nicer. I'm sure engineers wouldn't mind not being able to build it, just as long as they can still use it every now and again on maps that allow it.

Suggestion: Engineer Fortification/Building Datapad Additions The engineers are quite a support role regiment in premise, providing ammo, defenses and vehicles. But there are quite a few things that the engineers can't build. This could be, AT-ATs, the TIE Interceptor/Striker/Bomber, LAATs...

Oh god it's you

Suggestion: ISF Loadout Additions/Returns In the past the Imperial Special Forces used to have an array of weaponry from our skill tree, including heavy ordinance weapons and dioxis grenades. After talking with individuals who have been actively part of the regiment during current times or...