Accepted ISF Loadout Additions/Returns

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 16, 2022
6
0
1
Suggestion: ISF Loadout Additions/Returns

In the past the Imperial Special Forces used to have an array of weaponry from our skill tree, including heavy ordinance weapons and dioxis grenades. After talking with individuals who have been actively part of the regiment during current times or the past an agreement has been made.

We believe ISF should be given back their breaching charges and the grappling hook for the following reasons:

Breaching Charges - One of the capabilities of ISF is to board enemy Capital ships and destroy them from the inside. It may be possible for them to attempt to secure rooms by locking them, in which situation a breaching charge would be highly beneficial compared to a thermal detonator or impact grenade. This used to be part of our kit so I see no issue with us having it again.

Grappling Hook - ISF can tend to search out vantage points in order to use our DLT-19X to effectively handle rebels from a distance, which can result in us taking some less orthodox positions or positions you can't reach without the grappling hook. ISF used to have it in the past so I see no issue with it being given back

How will this affect the server?: It would allow members of ISF to regain their former abilities which they were capable of (infiltration and providing long ranged covering fire), as well as make the regiment more enjoyable and appealing for people who may wish to join the regiment. This is due to the fact that the grappling hook will offer a much more versatile playstyle for the regiment as a whole. It also just brings back equipment which the regiment had in the past, which is one of the reasons some people would have joined ISF.

Additional Notes/Relevant Links: Equipment like the Dual E-11s, E-60R, Dioxis Grenades, Repair Tool and Fusion Cutter are not part of this suggestion due to future plans within ISF.
 

NamiiDesu

Member
Feb 21, 2022
15
1
3
+1
Flying Dragon Ball GIF by Xbox
 
Status
Not open for further replies.